EU President of Council Charles Michel (2nd-R) and European Commission President Ursula von der … [+] Leyen (C) arrive to give a joint press conference after a G7 Leaders’ videoconference on COVID-19 at the EU headquarters in Brussels on March 16, 2020. – Ursula von der Leyen on March 16 proposed that the EU close its borders to non-essential travel, as Europe scrambles to fight the spread of the coronavirus disease. Charles Michel will official propose the measure at an EU leaders summit on March 17 that will be held by videoconference. That meeting will come one day after the G7 holds a similar high-level videoconference. (Photo by Kenzo TRIBOUILLARD / AFP) (Photo by KENZO TRIBOUILLARD/AFP via Getty Images)
AFP via Getty Images
The level of foreign direct investment (FDI) to the US is staggering. The Bureau of Economic Administration reports total inflow of $4.34 trillion for 2018. More than half of the investment comes from five countries: United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, Netherlands, and Luxembourg. Two-thirds of the total investment comes from Europe. China accounts for only 1% of FDI, though the level tripled from 2015 to 2016. Foreign investments went overwhelmingly to manufacturing (40%), followed by wholesale and retail trade (13%), and information technology (4%). While most investments are positive to the US, some entail a security risk. The US established the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) in 1975  to review the security implications of foreign investment.
The European Union boasts an even higher total FDI, some $5 trillion annually. The European Parliament notes a drastic change in the structure and source of FDI to the EU, with investment from China growing six-fold and the targeting of high-tech sectors by companies with state ownership or affiliation. Last year the European Parliament adopted the first EU-level tool to screen FDI for security, noting concerns about investment made by opaque, non-European state-owned companies into critical sectors and technologies. The FDI screening function has taken on heightened importance in the wake of COVID19. The European Commission issued subsequent guidance, urging member states to preserve EU companies and critical assets, such as health, medical research, biotechnology and infrastructures that are essential for security and public order, without undermining the EU’s general openness to foreign investment.
The Parliamentary Intelligence-Security Forum (PI-SF) offers expert insight and policy recommendations for the benefit of national security and technology markets. Founded by former Congressman Robert Pittenger, a recent PI-SF webinar “Foreign Investments Affecting National Security” featured the Honorable Tom Feddo, Assistant Secretary of Treasury for Investment Security who oversees Treasury’s foreign investment review process through CFIUS. Asst. Sec. Feddo described the renewed CFIUS following its recent and overwhelmingly bipartisan reform in the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA), sponsored by Mr. Pittenger in the House of Representatives and John Cornyn (R-TX) in the Senate.

Parliamentary Intelligence Security Forum Event on Foreign Invesments Affecting National Security. … [+] July 7, 2020.
PI-SF
Asst. Sec. Feddo observed that foreign investment promotes economic growth, productivity, competitiveness, and job creation, the benefits of which include more resources to invest in national security. A well-resourced and national security-focused focused foreign investment review mechanism is important for any nation. The FIRRMA legislation preserves open investment while modernizing processes. It expands jurisdiction to targeted areas and fast-tracks review for transactions for sensitive. In the past, participation in CFIUS was largely voluntary. Now certain kinds of transaction entail mandatory review, such as when a foreign government takes a major interest in a US asset and when critical technologies are play. As I noted in my recent whitepaper co-authored with Mr. Pittenger, CFIUS’ Growing Power to Protect American Security from China Tech Threats: Examining TikTok and Lenovo”, FIRRMA now requires review of cybersecurity and personal data implications of foreign investment. 

Such informational risks are paramount in the current pandemic as Americans use information technology networks to work, learn, and receive healthcare online, a situation that strategic and adversarial competitors could exploit. Indeed, fledging US companies which are also struggling under the current financial crisis are targets for malicious foreign investment.
Fortunately, CFIUS has stepped up to meet the national security challenge, with some 230 notices filed in each of 2018 and 2019. This has been bolstered by enhanced staffing and IT resources.
Asst. Sec. Feddo described an important part of CFIUS’ mandate which is to work with allies, and international engagement has a dedicated office within CFIUS. In the last two years, CFIUS has interacted 250 times with some 50 counterparts around the world, and has shared best practices with many. Indeed investment security has its own track among the discussion of the G7 nations (in addition to US, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom). Protecting economic security while promoting economic growth is paramount.
Asst. Sec. described eight keys to an effective foreign investment review mechanism. He noted that while differing systems can achieve effective outcomes and must operate within their own legal and regulatory constructs, there are common elements.
1.      National Security Focus. The mechanism must have a singular focus because the free flow of benign capital will be critical to resuming strong and sustainable economic growth worldwide.
2.      Broad application. The mechanism must apply broadly and be cross-sectoral. It should not be limited to defense applications. Indeed, commercial startups could be key to future military advantage.
3.      Capability to identify and analyze the appropriate transactions.
4.      Authority to address the national security risks of transactions, to mitigate or block if needed.
5.      Ability to monitor and enforce conditions imposed on transactions.
6.      Maintenance of confidentiality of the parties’ sensitive commercial information. This ensures the trust and transparency of the process.
7.      Dedicated resources and staff.
8.      Adaptability to new environments and challenges
Asst. Sec. Feddo noted that while different systems can work, they must be bound by the rule of law and have substantive measures.

the Honorable Thomas Feddo, Assistant Secretary for Investment Security U.S. Department of the … [+] Treasury
US Treasury

Source

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *